Survey results: Manufacturers tell how they implement change

Sept. 3, 2013
Tech-Clarity surveyed dozens of manufacturers that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. Here are the results.

Let's face it, changing manufacturing processes causes disruption and headaches, and few people like change. If you asked engineers and plant staff in a factory about it they might say, "Change is hard" or "The only constant around here is change" or even, "Everything would be so much better around here if things would just stand still for a little while.”

But agility is critical to competing in a competitive marketplace, so manufacturer must master change management so they can adapt their factories quickly, efficiently, and with confidence.

How do leading manufacturers do it?  Independent research firm Tech-Clarity surveyed more manufacturers (from more than 250 identified) that excel at implementing factory change — manufacturers that meet project due dates, meet budgets, and meet target production volumes. These top performers also get changes implemented faster, even if the changes are more involved.

According to the survey, top performers:

• Better understand the full scope and impact of change in advance to avoid late surprises

• Communicate, collaborate, and share information to work as a team more effectively

• Adhere to more formal change management processes

The report — Tech-Clarity Perspective: Best Practices for Factory Adaptability — details the the challenges faced in implementing change and the business impacts of change. The research also shares the processes and software that some top performers say they use to be more agile.

What I find interesting about the results is that improving quality is the biggest driver of change — not boosting throughput (which would've been my guess). Perhaps even more surprising is that top-performing manufacturers said they implemented six to 11 small changes a year, and one to two major changes — those involving "significant change to equipment, procedures, or production lines." That's far more change than I would've guessed.

So tell us how your organization compares.  Do you see a lot of change in your workplace?  How is it managed?   Who takes responsibility for making sure new procedures get executed? Drop me a line below.

About the Author

Elisabeth Eitel Blog

Elisabeth is Senior Editor of Machine Design magazine. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Fenn College at Cleveland State University. Over the last decade, Elisabeth has worked as a technical writer — most recently as Chief Editor of Motion System Design magazine.

Sponsored Recommendations

50 Years Old and Still Plenty of Drive

Dec. 12, 2024
After 50 years of service in a paper plant, an SEW-EURODRIVE K160 gear unit was checked. Some parts needed attention, but the gears remained pristine.

Explore the power of decentralized conveying

Dec. 12, 2024
Discover the flexible, efficient MOVI-C® Modular Automation System by SEW-EURODRIVE—engineered for quick startup and seamless operation in automation.

Goodbye Complexity, Hello MOVI-C

Dec. 12, 2024
MOVI-C® modular automation system – your one-stop-shop for every automation task. Simple, future-proof, with consulting and service worldwide.

Sawmill Automation: Going Where Direct-Stop and Hydraulic Technologies “Cant”

Aug. 29, 2024
Exploring the productivity and efficiency gains of outfitting a sawmill’s resaw line with VFDs, Ethernet and other automated electromechanical systems.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!