A faster way to make tooling

April 20, 2000
A new layup-molding process developed by General Magnaplate Corp., Linden, N.J., reduces the time required to make layup molds (toolfaces) for large, contour-shaped, complex reinforced composites.

A new layup-molding process developed by General Magnaplate Corp., Linden, N.J., reduces the time required to make layup molds (toolfaces) for large, contour-shaped, complex reinforced composites. The result is significantly faster tooling delivery and lower costs.

The patented, robotically controlled process, called CMPT (custom moldmaking process technology), is a dense, multidirectional, metal-weaving technique that eliminates the need to machine heavy ingots or castings for layup toolfaces. CMPT cuts the time it takes to manufacture complex reinforced composite molds from between six and 12 months to just six weeks. It also reduces costs by one-third. Toolfaces can be made from any alloy -- aluminum to zinc -- including high-nickel Invar and stainless steel, and can also be treated with a permanent-release agent.

In the past, tooling that wasn't machined from billets or castings typically had stress problems from voids and iron-oxide contamination. But a CMPT toolface, equivalent to a Grade 2 casting, is reportedly more dense and contains fewer oxide voids than those produced by other methods. High-temperature tooling for long or short production runs is possible for cures up to 750°, and compaction pressures to 1,500 psi. According to the company, CMPT toolfaces have all the properties of solid-metal tools without the high cost, extra weight, and lengthy finishing time. A 5-ft2, 3-ft-thick Invar billet weighing 3,500 lb, for instance, generally takes four months to process, and can cost about $20,000 before it's ready for CNC machining. But a 5-ft2 CMPT toolface with a 3-ft contour weighs just 400 lb and takes about seven days to make, reducing costs by as much as 60%.

CMPT-produced toolfaces can be created with built-in piezo electronics programmed to monitor voids, intralayer damage, temperature, and rate controls, as well as surface positioning of the layup.

Sponsored Recommendations

Safeguarding Robots and Robot Cells

Dec. 23, 2024
Learn which standards are relevant for robot applications, understand robot functionality and limitations and how they affect typical methods of safeguarding robots, and review...

Automation World Gets Your Questions Answered

Dec. 23, 2024
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Basic OSHA Requirements for a Control Reliable Safety Circuit

Dec. 23, 2024
Control reliability is crucial for safety control circuits. Learn about basic wiring designs to help meet OSHA, Performance Level (PL), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) requirements...

Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Automation Equipment

Dec. 20, 2024
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) covers the basics of risk assessments, including the goals of the assessment, gathering the right team to perform them, and several methodologies...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!