Why did axle fail? FEA helps find out.

June 19, 2003
Unexpected loading turned out to be the culprit when axles on a people mover broke down repeatedly.

 

The new wheel-axle configuration handles impact loading and shows no stress concentrations in FEA results. The redesign uses a higher-grade steel with better fatigue qualities and a 40% larger diameter.

An FEA program from MSC.Software, Santa Ana, Calif. (www.mscsoftware.com) helped track down the problem. The axles are part of a 450-seat turntable that takes visitors through exhibits at the Hoover Dam. David Dearth, an engineering consultant and president of Applied Analysis and Technology, Huntington Beach, Calif. ([email protected]) got the job of determining causes for the repeated failures. He worked with metallurgist Larry McKnight of McKnight Labs, Santa Fe Springs, Calif.

The 84-ft-diameter table is supported by 66 10-in. wheels and turns at an outer-radius speed of 45 fpm. The support wheels turn on 2.5-in. steel axles and support the nearly 900,000-lb platform. Dearth reexamined the initial design using hand calculations, sizing estimates, and MSC.visualNastran for Windows.

After a metallographic analysis, McKnight suggested that cyclic fatigue led to the frequent catastrophic axle failures. FEA analysis models back up his theory. "FEA pinpointed crack initiation in the fatigue damage. The software also showed the locations of the stress concentrations, and I used the results to generate my own fatigue analysis," he says.

Dearth ran at least a dozen different linear-static scenarios with different load cases. Physical tests showed many sources of crack initiation in the original design, indicating that loading conditions were greater than expected. "This type of cracking is caused by impact loads," says Dearth. "These came from waviness in the turntable, like the curves in a potato chip."

Input from Allan Battenfield, a design consultant, helped Dearth generate a revised modular design that solved the problems. "The original axles used 1020 Series steel with a 79-ksi ultimate strength. Results suggested using a 4340 bar stock, which has a 180-ksi ultimate-stress rating and better fatigue characteristics," says Dearth.

About the Author

Paul Dvorak

Paul Dvorak - Senior Editor
21 years of service. BS Mechanical Engineering, BS Secondary Education, Cleveland State University. Work experience: Highschool mathematics and physics teacher; design engineer, Primary editor for CAD/CAM technology. He isno longer with Machine Design.

Email: [email protected]

"

Paul Dvorak - Senior Editor
21 years of service. BS Mechanical Engineering, BS Secondary Education, Cleveland State University. Work experience: Highschool mathematics and physics teacher; design engineer, U.S. Air Force. Primary editor for CAD/CAM technology. He isno longer with Machine Design.

Email:=

Sponsored Recommendations

Safeguarding Robots and Robot Cells

Dec. 23, 2024
Learn which standards are relevant for robot applications, understand robot functionality and limitations and how they affect typical methods of safeguarding robots, and review...

Automation World Gets Your Questions Answered

Dec. 23, 2024
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Basic OSHA Requirements for a Control Reliable Safety Circuit

Dec. 23, 2024
Control reliability is crucial for safety control circuits. Learn about basic wiring designs to help meet OSHA, Performance Level (PL), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) requirements...

Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Automation Equipment

Dec. 20, 2024
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) covers the basics of risk assessments, including the goals of the assessment, gathering the right team to perform them, and several methodologies...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!