The Right Tool for the Job: Cloud vs. Local Solutions

Nov. 12, 2024
Uncover the debate between cloud computing and local processing and aerospace and other manufacturing, focusing on the specific needs of complex component designs.

At the recent International Manufacturing Technology Show (IMTS), there was an undeniable trend: a significant presence of cloud technology in the manufacturing sector, prominently featuring major names like Google Cloud, AWS and Microsoft. This venue was also where Machine Design met Tyler Nelson, a principal engineer from Pan Optimization, a pioneering firm in the simulation software domain, that was founded in 2022 by its CEO Pan Michaleris, Ph.D., and Chief Engineer Erik Denlinger, Ph.D.

In this final of a three-part series, Nelson and Denlinger talk about the cautious stance that the aerospace and defense sector has when it comes to cloud adoption. Denlinger noted that while his team remains open to cloud solutions if there is a customer demand, their primary focus is guided by the unique requirements of their client base. Currently, many aerospace and defense companies exhibit a notable aversion to the cloud, primarily due to stringent security and privacy concerns. Nonetheless, Denlinger points out the ease of transitioning local applications to a cloud environment should the demand arise.

Machine Design also asks about artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. While these technologies are hailed as revolutionary, Denlinger expresses skepticism about their immediate applicability and solutions tailored for geometric modeling. The primary breakthroughs in AI, particularly in language processing, don’t directly align with the geometric challenges faced in manufacturing. The limitless nature of geometric problems suggests that traditional AI approaches may not provide the desired advancements in the field. 

Nelson talks about the context of practical applications and stresses the importance employing the right tools for specific tasks, especially in industries where input data can be substantial and expensive to manage. Both experts highlight that while cloud computing offers certain advantages, such as unparalleled computational power, it may not always be the best fit for the intricacies of aerospace components.

Looking forward, Denlinger and Nelson see a bright future for optimizations that go beyond current limitations, hinting at innovations and areas such as topology optimization for manufacturability. Their belief in the untapped potential of advanced simulation tools is clear, with hopes to reshape methodologies in aerospace and defense manufacturing.

Watch additional parts of this interview series with Erik Denlinger and Tyler Nelson:

Part 1: Panning for Optimized Additive Manufacturing

Part 2: Navigating the Future of Directed Energy Deposition (DED) and Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Simulations

About the Author

Sharon Spielman | Technical Editor, Machine Design

As Machine Design’s technical editor, Sharon Spielman produces content for the brand’s focus audience—design and multidisciplinary engineers. Her beat includes 3D printing/CAD; mechanical and motion systems, with an emphasis on pneumatics and linear motion; automation; robotics; and CNC machining.

Spielman has more than three decades of experience as a writer and editor for a range of B2B brands, including those that cover machine design; electrical design and manufacturing; interconnection technology; food and beverage manufacturing; process heating and cooling; finishing; and package converting.

Email: [email protected]

LinkedIn: @sharonspielman

X: @MachineDesign

Facebook: Machine Design

YouTube: @MachineDesign-EBM

Sponsored Recommendations

Drive systems for urban air mobility

March 18, 2025
The shift of some of our transport traffic from the road to the air through urban air mobility is one of the most exciting future fields in the aerospace industry.

Blazing the trail for flying robots

March 18, 2025
Eight Bachelor students built a flying manipulator that can hover in any orientation and grasp objects. The drone is even more maneuverable than a quadrocopter and was designed...

Reachy 2: The Open-Source Humanoid Robot Redefining Human-Machine Interaction

March 18, 2025
Reachy 2 was designed to adapt to a wide variety of uses thanks to its modular architecture.

maxon IDX: The plug-and-play solution

March 18, 2025
IDX drives combine power with small space requirements - a brushless BLDC motor combined with an EPOS4 positioning controller and a gearhead inside a high-quality industrial housing...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!