Tech. Sgt. Justin D. Pyle
The C-5 Galaxy transport jet

Air Force Uses 3D-Printed Parts on Transport Planes

Feb. 15, 2019
Printed parts are more capable, less expensive overall, and available much quicker.

After several weeks of printing, inspections, and component testing, the Air Force recently installed 17 3D-printed parts in both polymer and metal on a C-5 Galaxy transport jet in less than three days. The parts are used in various parts of the cabin and crew bunk areas of the plane and included overhead panels, reading and emergency light covers, window reveals, and gasper panels.

Aluminum seal-retention handles were also redesigned to take advantage of 3D printing (also known as additive manufacturing). Engineers redesigned the handles to be more ergonomically friendly, lighter, and more able to operate despite minor installation variations. They also reduced the  build time and eliminated the two-tone, multi-coat paint scheme that has been used since the inception of the aircraft, continuing to drive cost down.

With average print times of 24 to 48 hours, plus paint application, keeping an eye on cost and reducing cycle times was critical.

Air Force engineers worked with the company that supplies the polymeric raw material to get the printed material to be “gunship grey,” so parts could be printed in the color required for the interior cabin. This eliminated the need for painting prior to installation.

Many of the parts that were replaced with their printed counterparts were not available for purchase or had long lead times. So using 3D printing may only take a couple of days to print parts instead of the weeks, months, or even years it takes to acquire parts through traditional measures.

In the near future, the Air Force planes to install at least 20 more polymer and metal printed components on the aircraft. Some will be made of titanium and other high strength alloys, driving the technology to the next level.

As the Air Force’s additive manufacturing library of parts continues to grow, the cost benefits of additive manufacturing production will increase.

The RSO estimates that future field production of just these 17 parts alone could save tens of thousands of dollars, at the same time improving part performance and continuing to improve aircraft readiness.

Sponsored Recommendations

Safeguarding Robots and Robot Cells

Dec. 23, 2024
Learn which standards are relevant for robot applications, understand robot functionality and limitations and how they affect typical methods of safeguarding robots, and review...

Automation World Gets Your Questions Answered

Dec. 23, 2024
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Basic OSHA Requirements for a Control Reliable Safety Circuit

Dec. 23, 2024
Control reliability is crucial for safety control circuits. Learn about basic wiring designs to help meet OSHA, Performance Level (PL), and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) requirements...

Safety Risk Assessment Guidelines for Automation Equipment

Dec. 20, 2024
This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) covers the basics of risk assessments, including the goals of the assessment, gathering the right team to perform them, and several methodologies...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!