The military develops an arsenal of non-lethal weapons
Appears in Print As: Taking Out the Enemy… Without Hurting Them… … too Much
The military expands its arsenal of nonlethal weapons, giving the armed services more options for dealing with hostile forces without hurting noncombatants.
|
Authored by: Resources |
Over the past 20 years, the U.S. military, as well NATO and UN troops, have had to defend a variety of locations, stop approaching vehicles, or disperse crowds without using deadly force or endangering themselves. But the weapons at their disposal have historically been designed to maim or kill. To give military leaders more options, especially when innocent bystanders might be involved, the U.S. Defense Dept. established the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program (JNLWP) in 1996. Based at the Marine Corps Base Quantico and under the direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps, the program develops, evaluates, and deploys nonlethal devices.
Here are some of the weapons coming out of their laboratories and field testing.
Active Denial System
The ADS uses a focused beam of millimeter waves to stop an advancing crowd. The 95-GHz beam, which is roughly 3 ft in diameter, penetrates the skin to a depth of about 1/64th of an inch (the thickness of three sheets of paper), where it creates the sensation of heat. And a heavy overcoat provides zero protection. Within seconds, the heat becomes intolerable and targeted individuals forget about attacking and almost instinctively try to move out of the beam. And as soon as they are out of the beam, the sensation ceases.
ADS’s computer controls limit shot duration and keeps output power below 100 kW, making the beam safe but effective. (Shallow penetration and a short wavelength minimize the risk of permanent damage.) The weapons also include a display so the operator can see exactly where the beam is striking.
ADS has been studied since 2000, and safely, if painfully, tested on more than 3,500 military volunteers. And in over 11,000 exposures, the only injuries requiring medical attention were two blisters which healed without complications. The beam also will not ignite fuels.
Currently, the JNLWP is focusing on making the ADS smaller and lighter, as well as less expensive. To do this, they are developing a solid-state millimeter-wave source to replace the large vacuum tubes and gyrotron used today. The gyrotron, which is slightly more than 50% efficient, relies on pumps, fans, air conditioning, and refrigerators for cooling. Ancillary electronics consume up to 75 kW of electricity even when the beam is off. With the beam on, power requirements climb to 275 kW.
Researchers hope to replace the gyrotron with a chip that generates the same waves to shrink the equipment’s footprint and cost. The Program recently demonstrated a low-power 95-GHz chip and developers are working to boost its power.
Less lethal launcher
The FN-303, which might be the ultimate paint-ball gun, lets soldiers fire rounds that will hurt but not likely injure individuals. The .68 caliber rounds have a polystyrene body with stabilizing fins and a blunt, pebble-sized payload. The payload is made of nontoxic bismuth and breaks up on impact, reducing the risk of penetrating injuries. The bismuth “bullet,” which weighs 8.5 gm, is also hollow, letting it carry washable or permanent paint for marking individuals. In other words, the rounds leave a paint stain, much like a paint ball. So troops could identify those whom they had fired on by telltale paint marks. There are also pepper-spray rounds and inert, training rounds.
Projectiles are accurately propelled by compressed air for up to 100 m. A canister on the FN-303 is filled with air and pressurized to 3,000 psi, enough to fire about 100 shots. The launcher can hold up to 15 rounds in an easily replaceable magazine. The pressurized canister can be switched out as well.
The 29-in.-long launcher is made of a durable, polymer, letting it weigh in at about 5 lb. A flip-up iron sight and a laser “reddot” sight help soldiers hit their targets. The FN-303 is manufactured by FN Herstal, a Belgian firm.
Distributed Sound and Light Array
The DSLA currently under development consists mainly of two so-called sensory stimulators: a high-output phased acoustic array and a dual high-output coherent (laser) and noncoherent (white light) optical array.
The acoustic array, dubbed the Target High-Output Responder-162 (Thor), employs 16 horn-loaded compression drivers that create a beam of sound which can be electronically steered. Electronics also control beam width. For example, the beam can be highly focused to a small spot or distributed as a wide, “spread” pattern without physically moving the speakers. Thor is rated at 200 to 300 W, and puts out sound levels as high as 145 dB for voice commands and up to 150 dB for warning signals. Though it could transmit any sound, everything from polka to punk, it currently broadcasts just voice commands and warning signals.
The light array includes a green laser and four bright white xenon lamps. The four lamps include two spot lights, each with 12 million candlepower and a 1° divergence, and two enhanced search lights, each putting out 20 million candlepower with a 10° divergence. The four lamps surround the laser. Operators can adjust the laser’s irradiance from 69 to 32,700 µW/cm2 at 200 m. The laser is kept to less than 1,000 µW/cm2 when pointed at individuals, the ANSI safety standard for eye-safe exposure to laser.
The DSLA, which mounts on a Humvee, has two general purposes: hailing and warning, and crowd control. The bright lights and loudspeaker let soldiers warn away approaching cars or boats or command them to stop, and be confident the driver heard and saw the warnings.
For crowd control, the amps are turned up and the sound and light intensities climb high enough to “severely degrade” the ability of opposing forces to accurately throw or aim weapons, or communicate via phone. The laser, also called a disruptor, can switch between continuous and pulsating modes to work with the acoustic array and confuse and disorient foes or just clear crowds from an area. Although the range of the DSLA depends to some extent on the weather, it has been shown to work at ranges up to 2 km.
Operators of the DSLA, which can be carried by a Humvee, protect themselves by wearing ear protection and laser goggles, and staying clear of the front and projecting sides of the array. The laser is also electronically prevented from irradiating the operator’s control console and area. A camera provides images to the operator to let him know where the arrays are pointed.
Vehicle Lightweight Arresting Device
Compared to the other nonlethal weapons, VLAD is relatively simple. It resembles a volleyball net with spikes on the edge. The spikes, made of carbon steel, can pierce most vehicle tires and attach themselves to the tires of any vehicle that drives over them. Then the net wraps around the front axle and tires, eventually bringing the vehicle to a stop. The net is made of Dyneema, a high-modulus, strong, lightweight polyethylene fiber.
VLAD can be strung across a road by hand or a remote deployment device (RDD). The RDD is a electric winch that, once activated, pulls the VLAD across the road in seconds. VLAD will drag a 2-ton vehicle traveling 60 mph to stop in 75 m with minimal damage to passengers and the vehicle. A larger, more-capable version, the Single Net Solution currently being developed, will stop a 10-ton vehicle.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments
ADS on a smaller scale
I bet the ADS could be used down under to control and capture the large over population of rabbits in Australia. Same goes for Roos. It could conceiveably be used in African game preserves, and National Parks to prevent wondering pacaderms and other endangered animals from exiting the park unexpectedly. This would keep them out of the hands of poachers, and angry farmers outside the their borders. Heck it might even be used to control the poachers themselves.
On ranches, strategically placed units could be used to herd cattle and sheep away from difficult terrain in canyons and waterways keeping personnel and animals safe such situations. At the gathering point, the herds could be managed for encoding, herded for market.
Another slightly modified application for the ADS would be to use it in a broader sense as gigantic hand warmer for animal herds in winter near a watering hole or cistern if the singing part of the ADS could be toned down to apply soothing warmth rather than pain.
Another possibility might be to unfreeze things frozen from adverse weather systems like planes, snowplows, roads and bridges, and electronic services like cell towers, power systems, water and waste water systems and pumps.
Maybe something like ADS could be used at NASA to help keep rockets that use liquid o2 and other gases from creating dangerous ice around fueling ports, and the such.
In dams, and other water ways where ice is always a problem blocking inlets, flood gates, etc, maybe ADS could be applied here clear or loosen the ice. Maybe a highly focused version of ADS could be used as way to fracture ice flows in water ways, and shipping lanes helping ice breaker ships.
Or ADS could just stay a niche invention that only controls people as it was designed ,and not the enviroment where it may have a greater more productive role for human and beasts alike. Who knows?
ADS on a smaller scale
You know, if one could minaturize or subminaturize the ADS, it could be used to shoo away rodents in sewers, protect crawspaces in homes and schools from rodents and small mammals, and keep pests out of grain silo's too. This would be a good thing. I wonder if it would work on insects, spiders, and crustacians? There is commercial potential here for ADS with farmers, homeowners, factories, businesses, civilian goverment, perhaps even in parks and forestry services.
Good idea, but what about
Good idea, but what about your family pets? This would not be a good idea in a home with pets (dogs).....
Focused sound
Quite some time ago I saw a segment on tv (60 minutes?)
where a man had invented the ability to focus sound. It's main
purpose was not to necessarily "screech" someone into
obedience. It was to literally knock someone off their feet with
the physical force of the sound wave itself. I don't recall much
more about that segment other than I thought it would be
great to have a few of those on the ships being pirated!
Weapons
Now this is something that you do not hear about in the news every day but probably should. This sounds like it is going to be a great answer to a big problem. All we hear is how horrible it is. online casino
Non lethal weapon systems
The frequencies in ADS are attenuated significantly as one tries to go through vegetation...too much water. The loss makes the range about as good as a 4 cell flashlight under the same circumstances.
In Viet Nam, when the enemy had their coffins made (and yes, they did that before many pitched battles) there was only one way to stop them. Reason or simple capture was not enough. Similarly, the challenges faced with Islamic 'hard-liners" preclude successful capture and pacification. Simply put, in most combat scenarios, lethal force is the only option. It should be mentioned that non-lethal, crippling or maiming (forbidden by most treaties) is quite common when dealing with certain groups, because it takes only one to dig a grave, but at least 4 to care for a badly injured person.
The bulk of these 'non leathal' systems are indeed, intended for urban pacification, or controlling one's own populace. Witness the use of RF weapons in 1950's riots in Ireland by the British.
Non-lethal weapons
Although primarily designed for urban
crowd control, they have military
applications as well. Defeat of an enemy
does not always required killing, less
"killing them all".
But consider a war in a jungle setting,
the ADS would enable "flushing" an
area. Even in a pitched firefight, the
ability to confuse and disorient a wide
swath of enemy troops yields an
advantage. So these would be
considered more "supplemental"
weapons/resources, not primary ones.
But would aid in more quickly gaining
superiority on the field, saving lives
on both sides.
non-lethal
1. these are lawyerish weapons to curb the aggressiveness of so called independent organization for the terrorist protection
2. what you do when the ccivilian are used as a human shield by not so scrupulous "free army organizations" and going away under sound and light spectacles has the death of the civilian from behind, from those using them as shield?
have you seen the video where a Hamas "fighter" catches a child, holds him in front of him and passes a street ?
For civilian demonstration is it again billions of the taxpayer money spend for some politician good will. For civilian demonstrations water jets (even colored) are enough.
In front of the army are enemies, in front of the police are non-law obedient citizens.
non lethal weapons
The General pershing comment is correct "civilize 'em with a Krag"
Wonderful police and riot control equipment though. Much of it sound engineering building upon proven technologies such as paint ball guns.and a leg up on older concepts like "rubber" bullets and bean bag guns.
Frank
Non-lethal weapons
While an admirable concept, the battlefield has no rules, particularly when dealing with an enemy that thinks nothing of taking him/her self with them. General Pershing had the correct technique in the Philippines, almost a century ago, now.
These weapon systems are designed for URBAN PACIFICATION against unarmed citizens, NOT a pitched battle.
Sadly, the only way to ‘fight’ is to destroy your opponent. Anything less, and you have to fight the war again.
Leave a comment