My Site
Skip to Content

Rotary engine burns diesel

July 7, 2005

Stephen J. Mraz

The RandCam Direct Charge engine is an internal-combustion engine built around a rotary design.

Printer-friendly version

The technology is owned and licensed in North America by Regi Tech, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada (regtech.com). Its makers claim a RandCam engine would have two to three times the power and weigh half as much as a Wankel engine of the same size.

The engine is comprised of a disc-shaped rotor and driveshaft which turn the housing, or stator, which remains stationary. Up to 12 vanes mounted parallel to the shaft slide up and down along the outside of the rotor as they follow a track along the inside of the stator housing. Combustion chambers form between the rotor, stator walls, and vanes, and their volumes change as the vanes move during rotation. Although the design could use only two vanes, the current version has 12, which generate 24 combustion events (intake, compression, ignition, exhaust) per rotation. This lets the engine generate 1 hp/0.75 lb, as compared to a conventional internal-combustion engine's 1 hp/6 to 7 lb. The engine has a compression ratio of 20:1, which lets it burn a variety of fuels, including diesel. It also uses 13 moving parts rather than 40 for conventional piston engines. That's because the rotor and vanes replace timing gears, connecting rods, pistons, cylinders, and valves. This should improve reliability and cut manufacturing costs. The engine also generates lower vibrations because all the components are spinning in the same direction. There are no pistons or valves making thousands of abrupt changes per minute. The combustion chambers are also balanced around the rotor, plus the rotor acts as a flywheel to smooth out power imbalances and eliminate destructive harmonics. The makers admit, however, that tolerances are crucial to efficient operation of the engine. Based on its high-power density, low weight, reduced vibration, and multifuel capability, a 42-hp version will likely be installed soon on a military UAV.

Comments

This same exact design has

This same exact design has been used in the UK in the past as a supercharger for car and motorcycle engines and I believe it was previously tried as spark ignition engine. No longevity or reliability.

it looks more like a type of

it looks more like a type of turbine engine than a wankel type . A wankel uses an eccentric shaft and is named after Dr Wankel its inventor.
An interesting redesign of a turbine engine.

BEWARE

They have been at this same stage since the late 90's with very little advancement.

electric generator model

I'd run diesel at a constant rpm to avoid the sealing problems - spin it up with electric rather than trying to ignite the rotation, and it should seal fine with many combustions per revolution smoothing out the events - the problem with the rotary seals are chatter from the combustion event - port sealing has been solved, the side seals almost never have a problem, but the vanes are big enough with enough contact area compared to a rotary engine seals that they should be able to keep them from getting damaged except normal wear - should be easy to rebuild a small engine as well

Sealing issues

Before investing in this I spoke with a friend who is an automotive engineer. His analysis was that they will likely never get this type of engine to seal properly. I asked him back in late 2005 after this article first appeared. I see that there has been little change in four years. I think perhaps he was right. I suppose it's always best to ask real engineers before jumping into an investment like this.

product obtaining

It's a very interesting and original concept, what stops the commercial production?
if it's being produced - can't find it . would be interested in obtaining an engine of aproximately 50 hp. preferebly diesel ,
good luck, and waiting for further progress

I could see this type of

I could see this type of diesel engine used used in an electric car like the upcoming Chevy Volt to power a lighter weight high effenciey generator to extend the range while we work on better batteries.

why?

So, what stops this wonder to be adopted by major car, marine & aeronautical industries? Short lifespan, or high fuel consumption, or emissions?

Why

Perhaps they are bargaining over it now. Or maybe companies have that "Not-invented-here" syndrome.

telsa

again just a thought but tesla built that disc turbine or if you prefer a very eficent pump using a preferated steel plate laid between a ceramic disc . the thought being is that if a wankel design is incorperated in to a tesla turbine what would happen . oh what happened to the tornado engine that was rumered to be in the works

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Acceptable Use Policy