Reinventing the flywheel
Appears in Print As: Reinventing the flywheel
Mechanical batteries hold promise for making wind and solar energy more reliable
|
Authored by: |
The ability to store electricity for later use is becoming significantly more important as the U. S. increases its use of renewable power. Wind and solar-electricity generation is intermittent and sometimes unreliable when the sun doesn’t shine or the wind doesn’t blow. A passing cloud, for example, can easily cut photovoltaic-power output by 80% within seconds.
Storage lets utility companies “stockpile” excess energy and deliver it when wind and solar power are unavailable or when electricity demand increases.
Today’s electrical grid has virtually no storage capacity. The few storage facilities that do exist rely on pumped hydropower: surplus electricity is used to pump water uphill to a reservoir, then water flows downhill through turbines to generate electricity when needed.
While pumped-hydropower storage is proven and often cost effective, it is only feasible in a few locations. The Dept. of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E), through its Grid-Scale Rampable Intermittent Dispatchable Storage (GRIDS) program, is funding research with the aim of developing new energy-storage technologies that match the reliability and cost of pumped hydropower, but are modular and can be installed most anywhere.
One such ARPA-E-funded project focuses on flywheels. A team led by Beacon Power Corp., based in Tyngsboro, Mass., is developing a next-generation flywheel energy-storage module that will hold four times the energy at one-eighth the cost of stored energy of current commercial flywheels. The proposed design will be capable of more than 40,000 full charge/discharge cycles and have a 20-year life, making it suited for grid-scale energy storage.
Flywheel storage
Flywheels — in essence, mechanical batteries — store energy by accelerating a cylindrical rotor to high speeds and maintaining the kinetic energy in the system as rotational energy. Slowing the flywheel releases energy when needed.
Performance is measured in units such as kilowatt-hours (kW-hr), indicating the amount of power available over a given period of time. Multiple flywheels can be used in tandem to provide megawatt-level storage capacities.
For example, Beacon’s current Smart Energy 25 flywheel can store and deliver 25 kW-hr of power for up to 15 min. The heart of the flywheel is a rotating rim fabricated from a graphite and fiberglass fiber-resin composite. Its high strength and light weight let it store more energy than comparable metal flywheels. A metal hub and shaft supports the composite rim, and a motor/generator mounts on the shaft. Together the rim, hub, shaft and motor/generator assembly comprise the rotor. When charging (or absorbing energy), the flywheel’s permanent-magnet motor draws power to accelerate the rotor. When discharging, the rotor’s inertial energy drives the motor, which acts as a generator, and produces electricity that flows back into the grid.
The flywheel spins at up to 16,000 rpm and the surface speed of the rim (tip speed) reaches approximately 1,500 mph. To minimize friction, drag, and energy losses, the rim levitates on a combination of permanent magnets and electromagnetic bearings and operates in a vacuum-sealed chamber. With extremely low parasitic losses, the flywheel can efficiently spin for extended periods with little power required to maintain operating speed.
Smart Energy 25 flywheels can handle hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles over their 20-year life and operate reliably for many years with little or no maintenance. They are typically used for utility-grid frequency-regulation applications, and are being examined for smoothing intermittent power delivery from renewable-generation facilities.
Groundbreaking design
Taking flywheel energy storage to the next level, however, will require a radical rethinking of the overall design, according to Beacon officials. Their proposed 100-kW, 100-kW-hr ARPA-E system will supply four times the energy of current 25-kW-hr units and deliver energy for an hour, versus 15 min in the smaller Smart Energy 25.
“It’s all about cost,” explains Richard Hockney, chief engineer at Beacon Power, and his team is working to bring the price of storage down from $4/kW-hr to $0.50/kW-hr. “This is not an incremental cost reduction effort, it’s a quantum leap, and that brings with it significant technical challenges,” cautions Hockney.
But that’s the point of the ARPA-E program, he stresses, backing projects so risky that no company would under take them on its own. If successful, however, such research promises extremely high payoff. “This program has those two elements: a factor of eight reduction in cost per kilowatt-hour and some extreme technical challenges to get there,” he says.
One way to reduce costs is to increase the amount of storage per unit. As you do that, says Hockney, there is a benefit in that the flywheel’s fixed costs become a smaller percentage of the overall cost of storing energy.
But building a bigger, higher-capacity unit entails considerable changes to current designs. First and foremost is eliminating the central shaft and hub to create what’s called a hubless flywheel, Hockney explains. “The hub in our 25-kW-hr unit connects the rim — the composite structure — to the shaft, on which we mount the bearings and motor.” Eliminating the shaft and hub yields significant costs savings, and it permits a much thinner rim that can attain higher tip speeds.
“Full speed will be about 9,000 rpm, versus 16,000 rpm in the 25-kW-hr unit,” he says. But the hubless design will let Beacon increase the diameter from 32 to 70 in. While rotational speed has dropped, more than doubling the diameter actually increases tip speed by about 25%. And tip speed, not rotational speed, is what counts in terms of a flywheel’s energy-storage capacity, according to Hockney.
The 100-kW-hr flywheel will have much the same carbon-fiber composite construction as in the smaller unit. But rotor weight will increase to about 4,000 lb compared to 2,500 lb in the 25-kW-hr design. “Raising energy storage by a factor of four with only a 60% increase in rotor mass gives a feel for how hard we’re pushing the technology,” he says.
Magnetic hurdles
The new flywheel is essentially just spinning a composite ring, notes Hockney. But without a shaft and hub, how do you suspend the ring and transfer power in and out?
After all, it still requires a means of support and a motor/generator, just like existing designs. Beacon’s answer is to mount magnets to the inside surface of the ring that will serve two purposes — create a magnet bearing as well as a permanent-magnet motor.
“Our current 25-kW-hr flywheel only uses an axial magnetic bearing, so it levitates magnetically but radially rides on ball bearings,” explains Hockney. “The new 100-kW-hr ARPA-E wheel will be completely magnetically levitated with no rotating elements, so there will be no contact between rotor and stator.
“Most parasitic losses in the current 25-kW-hr flywheel are in the motor-generator,” he adds. “But that’s because it is typically used for frequency regulation where the unit is constantly cycling.” For these applications, a high-efficiency motor-generator with moderate idle losses works best.
“The ARPA-E wheel is for a different application, supplying energy for up to an hour versus 15 minutes. With energy-storage time increasing by a factor of four, you become more concerned with standby losses,” says Hockney. Minimizing them requires a different motor-generator configuration.
The hubless design offers high-capacity storage with low losses, but the devil is in the details. “The hard part of the magnetic bearing and motor is the magnets we’re gluing to the ID of the rim,” he says. No material with the needed combination of mechanical and magnetic properties exists today that can do the job.
At full speed the rim strains about 1% and the ID increases about 0.70 in. “This means the magnets have to ‘grow’ with that strain and not crack,” says Hockney, which requires a powerful magnetic material that is also physically strong and extremely flexible.
Literature searches, manufacturing surveys, and discussions with more than a dozen magnet suppliers have turned up no suitable options. Again, stresses Hockney, that’s the nature of ARPA-E projects, and it’s forcing Beacon to develop a new material based on neodymium-boron-iron chemistry with a custom binder.
In addition to devising new magnets and a hubless design, Beacon also looks to reduce manufacturing costs. For example, the company is investigating a proprietary and, potentially, much faster method for making the carbon-fiber composite rim.
Finally, there’s safety. A 2-ton ring spinning at supersonic speeds poses obvious concerns should the rim contact the housing — say due to an earthquake or magnetic-bearing failure.
In either case, the rim must be contained and brought to a halt. So Beacon is developing a full-scale demonstrator of what’s called a touchdown bearing that can capture and stop the rotor. Engineers are currently analyzing several mechanical-bearing concepts before proceeding with prototypes and testing.
The program began last September and will run for two years. At that point, Beacon intends to successfully demonstrate the magnets, enhanced manufacturing processes, and the emergency shutdown bearings. “If this comes out well, it would represent a quantum leap in flywheel performance, and the payoff would just be enormous,” says Hockney. A prototype could be running by October of 2013, he adds.
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments
Flywheels and cost
I suspect that the costs given here are misquoted. At $4 per
KWH, each unit would only cost $100. More likely, the cost
is $4/WH, so the cost would be $100,000 per unit.
Power Smoothing
Great idea....with renewable generators the typical uptime is less that than the stated the power generation capacity, which you expect they rely on a non controllable input. However add in some of these, a smart bit of math and you would have a sellable probability curve/time to sell.
Killowatt vs Megawatt
So the flywheel units you are developing will be able to store 25 to 100 killowatt hours of energy. To get One megawatt hour of storage capacity would require 10 of the 100 flywheel killowatt hour units. Then let us say we have a windturbine unit that produces 1 megawatt. So ten of the storage units would have to be bought to store the energy from the wind turbine during one hour of operation assuming the wind turbine is producing at its rated capacity.
In order to have any significant impact upon the storage capacity of the US electrical grid, thousands of these units would be required to be installed.
It all comes down to costs. What is going to be the capital, installation, and maintenance cost of each of these units and what will be the increased cost to the electrical customer in the end.
I suspect in the end this concept will just be another way to waste some more of the Federal Government's subsidation money like it is being wasted on the thousands upon thousands of the wind turbines.
You're right, let's just
You're right, let's just give up and keep subsidizing the coal and oil industries until they burn all the fossil fuels we can find.
Units in the flywheel article
Ken;
Fascinating article. Thank you for letting us know about this cool new twist on an old technology. The engineering challenges sound fascinating. This would be a great project for any engineer to work on.
Sorry to be difficult, but I think a few units and terms were used incorrectly in your article. In the third paragraph in flywheel storage section, states" For example, Beacon’s current Smart Energy 25 flywheel can store and deliver 25 kW-hr of power for up to 15 min. " 25 kw-hr is energy, not power. Power is of course the time rate of doing work or acepting or delivering that energy, correspondingly work or energy is the time integral of power. If 25 kW-hr got delivered in 15 minutes or 1/4 hours, it better be at the rate of 100 kW of power. The article described a 100 kW-hr (energy) flywheel that runs for one hour (time) and delivers 100 kW of power (time rate of delivering energy). Those units were spot on.
Thank you for your consideration.
cost, life, safety, and functionality of energy storage
i would like to clearify, no storage is too small if you have enough units. for computers a ups is about 1 to 10 kilowatt hour and a house ups backup may be about 3 megawatt hours for environments of storm damage to public utilities such as in Hawii and here in eastern washington state near spokan, also at the pacific coast of washington state. power lines go down, computers don't work, and home grow cold, businesses close . low cost flywheel storage can help . most important is keeping computers up and working with 25 Kw hrs and 10 kw in/ out capability and upto a 60 year life. to power an automobile on a high way requires 100 kilowatts for one half hour usually for a total vehicle weight of a ton and use near 100 kilograms for the auxillary storage for propulsion and habitat and use less than 7 liters of space and cost $500.00== to the price of the car
Leave a comment