Skip to Content

Patent Lawsuit Could Cost Billions

November 3, 2009

Kenneth J. Korane

Printer-friendly version
Ed Green
Patent Attorney
Coats and
Bennett PLLC
Cary, N.C.

A recent patent lawsuit (Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co.) in federal circuit court has the intellectual property world taking note and offers important lessons for businesses. The Solo Cup Co. is being sued by a patent attorney claiming the company is misleading consumers by marking its products with expired patent numbers.

Patent law provides for a fine up to $500 for each offense of false patent marking. Solo Cup Co. has produced an estimated 20 to 50 billion products since the patents expired. While courts have broad latitude in defining what constitutes an “offense,” and are unlikely to consider each marked product a separate offense, Solo could still face significant fines for patent mismarking.

This unusual case raises the question of how businesses can protect themselves from patent-marking bounty hunters. Given that federal law allows individuals to sue for false marking and reap monetary benefits, it is imperative that companies learn how to avoid false-marking liability.

The first step is to mark patented products with the corresponding patent number(s). Assuming your products are correctly marked and the patent is in force, here are some tips on how to protect your company against false-marking issues:

Pay attention to detail. When your patent expires, stop marking the product even if it means altering the production process. Otherwise, you risk accusations of false patent marking. Outsiders can argue that you are deceiving the public about the existence of patent protection for the marked product. Because the false-marking statute allows individuals to sue, anyone can monitor for false marking and file suit when they believe a product is improperly marked. That person collects half the damages awarded if false marking is found, and the other half goes to the government.

Patent ongoing innovation. Your patent has an expiration date 20 years from when you first file, but you can still patent new and improved changes to the product that increase the market value. This offers additional product protection beyond the length of the original patent.

Build your fan base. During your period of exclusivity, establish your market and develop a strong brand name. Your brand identity can be trademarked, which will become your most valuable protection asset once the patent expires.

Use your trademark. A strong trademark will help you continue dominance despite expired patents, even though it can’t exclude competitors entirely. Customers are loyal to brands they like and a strong trademark demonstrates the relationship you have built with consumers.

Coats and Bennett PLLC (www.coatsandbennett.com) provides intellectual property legal services including patents, trademarks, copyrights, licensing, trade secrets, and related litigation.

Edited by Kenneth Korane

Comments

.. back to ambulance chasing

"The Eastern District of Virginia granted summary judgment in favor of Solo Cup Co. that it was not liable for improper patent marking under 35 U.S.C. § 292(a). Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co., No 1:07cv897-LMB/TCB (E.D. Va. July 2, 2009). The Court agreed with Solo that the advice of counsel it received to replace patent-marking molds with non-marking molds in a gradual fashion was reasonable. Solo’s overall conduct was held to evidence a lack of intent to deceive the public. The Court also held that an “offense” under the statute is the overall decision to mark improperly, thereby rejecting Pequignot’s argument that Solo should be penalized for each and every lid it marked."

I hope Solo now sues Pequignot to recover all its legal expenses, for "pain and suffering", and damage to its good name.

 For Pequignot, it's back to ambulance chasing.  Nice try but no cigars. Break a leg.

Cheers. 

 

 

 

 

 

Patents - what's a Patent ?

Yeah, it's true.

Years ago, before my time (and I'm old), the American People went ga-ga about Inventions and Patents.

People milled around the Water Cooler talking about how much they'd like to INVENT something and be rich ! This is all gone. Now it's all Lottery talk.

Thomas Edison has been dead for a century, and much of America's enthusiasm for Inventions died with him.

Consumers no longer care about Patents, not even a little. There's just no Marketing reason to mention them. It's more than a little sad.

And as this article points out, the people making the big bucks today are not the Manufacturers who produce an honest product that improves people's lives. No, the profiteers are Lawyers who produce nothing but lawsuits that sap America's strength.

Frivolous Lawsuits and needless Regulations have driven America into a steep decline. China will prosper, and we are lost.

Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co. - What a waste of time and effort

It appears that the gene pool has been contaminated yet one more time again. Pequignot, stop trying to be an attorney - you're not any good at it!!

Products are seldom patent marked

I am an old engineer. A couple decades ago, just about every product has patent numbers or "pat. pending" notices on them. The lowly light switch had patent markings.

This practice seemed to have fallen out of favor in recent years. For example, my new HP laptop has no patent markings on it, nor in the paperwork. In fact, I have gone over every gadget I purchased recently and none are patent marked.

Can you comment on the divergence between the law and actual practice?

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Acceptable Use Policy