My Site
Skip to Content

Mower Design Flaws Spark Deadly Fire

September 9, 2010

Jessica Shapiro

Printer-friendly version

A man died from serious burns after the garden tractor he was riding caught fire. He had been mowing a flat area for less than 5 min when gas in the fuel tank exploded and knocked him off the seat.

Fire investigators concluded a spark from the engine or another part of the mower lit a trickle of leaking gasoline. The flame climbed the leak path back to the gas tank where it ignited the remaining gasoline in the nearly full tank.

The design of the 30-year-old mower created a tunnel that funneled the flames through the instrument panel and toward the driver. The driver received second and third degree burns over 75% of his body that caused his death a few days later.

A more-detailed examination of the mower after the incident revealed the mower’s generator and the wire leading from the generator to the ignition coil were directly below the gas tank. Over time, a clip meant to hold the wire in place had broken and the wire’s insulation had worn away, creating ideal conditions for a spark.

The operator could have occasionally inspected the generator wire for worn insulation and proper attachment. If such inspection was required, the owners manual should have recommended it and detailed the dangers of exposed wiring near the fuel tank. Ideally, designers should have relocated the wire or the fuel tank to eliminate this danger.

Another danger the owners manual neglected was that of leaking or spilled gasoline, and there were no warnings on the mower. The gas cap screwed on with a single thread, a design that made cross-threading and leakage more likely. Finally, even if the operator was aware of the dangers of leaked gas, he could not have seen them when filling the mower or during operation.

The design of the mower cover that guided flames toward the operator compounded these design and documentation lapses. Other designs, including vents on the sides of the cover or a repositioned filling neck would have let flames escape away from the driver and turned a fatal fire into a scary close call.

The mower designers should have taken into account reasonably foreseeable wear and tear and operator error into account when designing the machine. Ideally, they should use materials and construction methods that last the lifetime of the part and errorproof parts of the machine that users interact with. But, as a minimum, the owners manual should warn users of potentially dangerous situations and there should be warnings at the point of use.

This month’s safety violation comes from the files of Lanny Berke, a registered professional engineer and Certified Safety Professional involved in forensic engineering since 1972. Got a safety violation to share? Send your images and explanations to jessica.shapiro@penton.com.

© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.

Comments

Mower Design Flaws?

The author mentions "the lifetime of the part". What is the life expectancy of a $600 lawn mower? It appears that the mower served admirably for it's design life. If a mower was designed with all Mr. Burke's suggestions and nobody got burned up until the mower was 40 years old, would that be a successful design? Would anyone be able to afford an explosion proof mower? It's just about impossible to make something fool proof.

Also, where is this grand "pool of knowledge" located so today's cheap lawn mower designers can take advantage of lessons learned? It doesn't exist in my industry (aerospace). Most companies guard their secrets pretty closely, so even in the age of the internet, I'm guessing it would be pretty hard to find. How many Google pages does one have to look at for it to be considered "due diligence" - 100? 1000? I don't remember finding anything useful after about the 3rd page.

Larry Burke's articles usually strike me as completely and utterly arrogant and this one is no exception. It's easy to throw rocks after the fact. Get out there and actually design something.

Common Sense Must be Applied as Machines Wear Down

I was suprised to see pictures of the mower that resulted in the tragic death of the owner / operator. In fact I drove one of these IH Cub Cadets for 33 years with help from my two sons. Sure, the "Yellow Tractor" had its faults, but as weekend warriors we took the responsibility to examine, diagnose, and report problems to each other. Such things, as substancial gasoline leaks, and frayed, sparking wires were fixed as a common sense repair. I thought enough of the tractor to buy the shop manual and consult with the IH service center when problems were too difficult. Saying that the double fault scenario described here is a design flaw and should have been covered in the owner's manual is like saying an auto manual should advise what to do when your brake pedal goes to the floor at the expressway on ramp. Volumns of instruction can not substitute for common sense. One picture of the cluttered tractor garage shows a gas can on the floor next to an acetylne torch set up. Not good ether! Incidently, the Cub Cadet had two brake pads the size of half dollars which you could only change by separating the rear and front chassis from each other.

mower design flaw sparks deadly fire

After reading the article i noticed that this lawn tractor is approximately 40 years old .I know this to be true because this is my hobby. The only reason this tractor caught fire was do to improper maintenance. A new lawn tractor will never last 40 years with all the new safety features.

Not much has changed except the way we review the accident

While I am sorry that the gentleman riding the mower died from the burns suffered from the explosion, I do not believe much has changed in the design of riding lawnmowers or standard push mowers. Also, the review of the accident by Mr. Burke applies 2010 knowledge and experience to a thirty year old mower design. How many other mowers from thirty years ago were designed in the same vein? Many I would think. How many products in general from thrity years ago would pass todays stringent standards? Not many. While the 30 year old riding mower may have design flaws by todays standards, are the same standards applied to the owner or operator? With the emense knowledge we have nowadays at our fingertips via the internet, warning labels or 30 page instruction manuals that basically say you should have a degree to operate most any machine, I find it difficult to believe anyone using such old equipment would not have enough knowledge or experience to take the time to review their equipment for wear and tear prior to use. Given all of this, if designers and engineers try to design in fool or idiot proof systems, things would never be designed, approved or built. The system in general would be far too restrictive.

Has anything changed?

After reading this article, I looked at some riding mowers while at the hardware store this weekend. Probably 20% of them had a unsupported electrical harness running right under an inline fuel filter. It would seem that in short order, such harnesses are going to suffer insulation damage via rubbing on the steel chassis. It would seem that such sets the stage for a repeat of this event. A few more clips to hold the harness away from the chassis would seem to make a huge difference. I also noticed a few engine covers were not vented except for gaps around the instrument panel. Again, this seems to set the stage for a repeated event. The only real difference I could see was the use of a different gas cap design, as well as plastic tanks. Yet, if one overfills the tank, fuel is most likely to run to the lowest point, and drip from there... thus being from the inline fuel filter right into the weakest link of the electrical harness. I would have thought things would have changed over the years...

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Acceptable Use Policy