Inventor's corner: A new twist on a fully independent vehicle suspension
Appears in Print As: A new twist on a fully independent vehicle suspension
Edited by Leslie Gordon
One might think that after more than 100 years of advances in automotive technology, every kind of suspension system would have already been invented. But the “VXI” by inventor Winthrop Dada is an entirely new kind of vehicle-suspension system. Dada says it eliminates most if not all of the problems inherent with prior suspension designs. Dada calls his invention the “VXI” because the suspension links form a “V” or “X” shape, and the system is fully independent, thus the “I.” An off-road enthusiast who owns a modified Suzuki Sidekick with a strut front and a live-axle rear, Dada initially set out to build a high-travel independent suspension for rock crawling. He eventually realized the VXI also eliminates common problems such as wheel scrub and unwanted camber change.
Most cars at neutral resting compression — where the suspension is neither loaded or unloaded — are set up with the front tires at negative camber, says Dada. “The trade-off is less rolling-resistance efficiency for a little more traction midcorner.” The second prototype (V2) of the VXI allows control of the camber to optimize it for cornering. Users can set the camber link, which is attached to a “variable-angle knuckle” — it sits like any knuckle, but varies in angle — for as much or little camber change as desired. As the camber link is moved ever higher up the adjustment holes on the longitudinal arm, the suspension will supply progressively more camber change — both positive and negative.
“In V3, which I just started building, the camber link will instead be ‘active.’ Rather than adjustment holes on the arm, there will be a slot, which will let the link move up and down depending on the steering input. This makes the active link like an ‘on-off’ switch for either no camber change or as much camber change as you’d like, eliminating the effect of body roll on grip and traction,” says Dada. The active link will provide optimized camber at all times, eliminating the need for static negative camber and thereby boosting efficiency. With the active camber link, the VXI will offer no camber-change during bump/jounce and dive/ squat yet will provide full control of camber in bodyroll (while cornering). (A vehicle dives when its nose goes down while braking. It squats while accelerating and the rear lowers. Bump and jounce happen when the car hits a bump on one side of its suspension.) In these circumstances zero camber change is desirable because it maximizes grip. However while cornering, the VXI provides the camber change needed to maximize the tire contact-patch when encountering roll in midcorner situations.
Also important to the design are the “floating pivot points” which Dada says have never been used before. These pivot points attach either to the “wheel carriage” (also previously unknown) or the chassis at one end but are free to float up and down, allowing large amounts of wheel travel in a compact arrangement. Suspension geometry is maintained by the cross bracing of the suspension arms. “One reason the VXI can provide more travel than other independent designs is the floating pivot points let the suspension arms fold into each other compactly, sort of like a hinge,” says Dada.
In addition, because where the pivot points attach to the chassis are wide apart and high up, Dada says the VXI is more stable than other suspensions — kind of like the greater stability of a widebeam lifeboat as compared to a canoe. The roll center is higher than the vehicle’s center of gravity — higher than almost any other design — yielding enhanced stability. So the vehicle is less likely to roll over in case of an accident.
© 2012 Penton Media Inc.

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments
Even a go kart has weight
Even a go kart has weight transfer. How does the design reduce weight transfer?
The rotating moments applied due to braking and acceleration would kill this pretty quickly.
VXI suspention
Well the first thing I see as a Remote Control Hobbiest and racer for the last 25 years is part of a supention design that has been comom place on remote control monster trucks for over 15 years now . So im not very impressed as a machinest Inventor myself . Also aftetr being a mechanic on heavy duty vehicles You have way to many moving parts in your design and with all of your extra pivot points iots just asking for huge amounts of wear and slop after hard use .
Aaron
15 years?
If you've seen a suspension like this ever made or used before I'd sure be curious to see pictures or a link of some kind. To my knowledge there's been nothing like this before, not really even close. As for your moving parts comments all I can say is I'm working on simplifying the design while also keeping it such that track/wheelbase remain completely fixed, camber is controlled like never before and independent wheel travel remains unprecedented. I understand your skepticism, believe me you're not the first to express these things. You are the first to say it's been done before though....
I'm not a machinist so I'm sure you're not impressed with the build quality. This V2 was built in my garage using wood-shop tools and aluminum bar. The next car I'm working on will be fully engineered and built using machine tools so stay tuned.
Winthrop Dada
Not sure if this is
Not sure if this is patentable due to prior art of Heath Robinson....I think he would approve though.
Personally I think the off axis torsion/torque loads would lead to rapid slop, bearing failure or torsional arm failure. Looks to me like the loadings are serveral orders of magnitude higher than a standard double wishbone configuration ... I shudder to think about a fatigue model of this design.
PS You're wrong about the zero track change...maybe in the horizontal plane but in 3 dimensions your track is definitely still changing and that's where it actually matters.
Track Change
If the camber-link is set to zero then there's absolutely no track-change, i assure you and I can prove it. Even if the camber-link is set to offer positive/negative camber gain/loss then the overall vehicle track-change is zero since the track gain on one side is offset by the track loss on the other side. So I respectfully stand by my assertion of zero track change.
As for Heath Robinson I'll have to look into that but some pretty knowledgeable people have reviewed the VXI and none have claimed prior art even close to the VXI. The patents are pending, I guess we'll see what the USPTO has to say.
Good design idea-sounds like
Good design idea-sounds like equal length A-arm suspension
turned from lateral to longitudinal--Also in operation how is
caster angle effected-seems like it will constantly change
looking at the common arm attachment point
In certain respects it does
In certain respects it does share performance aspects with an equal-length A-arm, you're correct. Both designs have their instant-center off to infinity for instance.
In bump/jounce/dive/squat the equal-length a-arms maintain optimal camber just like the VXI can achieve albeit without the fixed track-width of the VXI. The reason unequal-length A-arms (or SLA) are preferred over the equal-length design is that the SLA can provide negative camber in compression (i.e. body-roll), making for a larger tire-contact patch on the outside tire. The VXI can do as well or better than an SLA in this respect but then also optimizes the inside tire's camber as well which the SLA cannot do. Furthermore it's my assertion that the VXI's wide and high chassis mounts will result in significantly reduced weight-transfer meaning that the inside tires have much greater grip-potential than they do in an SLA design.
As for the caster comment I'm wondering if you mean camber? Caster on the VXI can be set to whatever the design calls for and is really just like any other suspension in this regard.
Thanks for the comment.
Winthrop Dada
Leave a comment