My Site
Skip to Content

Capacitance System Stops Table Saws from Amputating Fingers

April 20, 2010

Printer-friendly version

One day, Dr. Stephen Gass, an avid recreational woodworker and cabinet maker, was using his table saw when his training as a physicist and years of patent-law practice kicked in. He started to think about how to make the saw safer.

He discarded several mechanical-guarding and electrical approaches before deciding to use the phenomenon of electrical capacitance, similar to that used in electronic touchscreens. When a woodworker touches the blade, his finger becomes part of the blade’s electric circuit, changing the circuit characteristics.

Gass’ system, called SawStop, applies a 500-kHz sine-wave current to the blade and measures the voltage response every 6 msec. A sudden drop in voltage indicates a conductive foreign object, like a finger, is drawing current off the blade.

Once the touch is detected, analysis software acts to stop the blade as quickly as possible. When signaled, capacitor sends a surge of current into a fuse wire that holds back a mechanical spring. The current vaporizes the wire within 15 millionths of a second and releases the spring to force an aluminum “brick” into the teeth of the blade.

Gass tested his prototypes by touching hot dogs with similar conductive properties to human flesh to spinning blades and timing how long it took the blades to stop spinning. When the hot dog makes contact with the side of the blade or its teeth, SawStop halts rotation in microseconds. See the hot-dog test in action at www.sawstop.com/howitworks/videos.php.

The hot-dog demonstration was a hit at woodworking-machinery trade shows, but Gass couldn’t convince table-saw manufacturers to license his patented system. Instead, in 2005, Gass and two partners started a company that supplies table saws outfitted with SawStop.

The capacitance-sensing and feedback setup adds about $50 to the cost of each of the approximately 5,000 saws SawStop LLC sells yearly. Gass estimates if all table saws sold each year, say 500,000, implemented the technology, SawStop’s cost would drop by 50%. He says the same principles would work on radial-arm, compound-miter, band, and other saw types although the implementation would be different for each.

SawStop saws are currently more expensive than those made by larger manufacturers. However, woodworking companies may have to pay out millions of dollars to an employee who loses a finger on the job. Safer saws could help keep health, disability, and liability-insurance costs in check.

Gass knows of over 50 amputation injuries SawStop prevented. That kind of data could come in handy for attorneys representing workers who had digits amputated while using table saws. They could convince the courts that manufacturers who do not use SawStop knowingly ignored technology that could have made their products safer and that table saws without SawStop technology are defective.

If such an approach leads saw manufacturers to make their products more amputation-proof, that’s fine with Gass. He hopes increased demand for safety — for altruistic, financial, or legal reasons — will encourage the industry to adopt new preventive measures.

— Lanny Berke

Lanny Berke is a registered professional engineer and Certified Safety Professional involved in forensic engineering since 1972. Got a question about safety? You can reach Lanny at lannyb@comcast.net.

Edited by Jessica Shapiro

Comments

Devil's advocate

Lanny,
I am going to play the devil's advocate.
The last thing we need in this country is more Regulations-we are already being strung up high.
Regulations are for Europe and the socialists of this world.
I realize that accidents will happen; however, as the saying goes, the problem is the "NUT" behind the wheel.
We, design engineers, are supposed to use our utmost care to Design and Build anything,whether it be a car, or a machine of any type or anything else whatsoever and include "the state of the art" known Design and Safety features.
The manufacturers, in their best judgement, will decide as to what the consumer will want to spend for a particular product, and set their price structure accordingly.
This is the American way! Buyer beware!
The consumer, in his best judgement, will deside what he wants to pay, for whatever he wants to purchase.
The consumer is supposed to study the available products and either, pay for the functional features of the product, or he can pay for the flashy garbage, or he can pay for the safety items sold with the product. That is his choice!
Now, bear in mind, I am not talking about a material or manufacturing defect in which case a law suit is always the recourse for someone getting hurt.
 The moment we allow the law to come in the middle, we are again trying to protect the public "from cradle to grave." That, my friend, is impossible to accomplish.
Education and responsibility are what America needs to return to, so that we can again be No. 1 in the whole wide world! That's what made us great for hundreds of years.

John Kanterakis
Ret'd Design Enginee
Ford Motor Co.
San Diego, Calif.

Leave a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Acceptable Use Policy