Leland Teschler
Editor
On hot sweltering days, it is easy to
appreciate why air conditioners for
1.3 billion Chinese are a driving force
behind more efficient motor control.
“Almost every household in China
wants a room air conditioner. They
will buy an air conditioner before
they get a refrigerator,” says Fairchild
Semiconductor Marketing Director
Claudia Innes.
And those air conditioners must
be energy misers. “The Chinese like
efficient appliances because they
generally have only a 4-kW capacity in
their homes,” explains International
Rectifier Inc. iMotion Product
Management Director Aengus
Murray. (Residential capacity in the
U.S. is about 10 kW.)
Nevertheless, Asia isn’t the only
place where energy-efficient appliance
motors are gaining traction.
Appliances billed with green credentials
are starting to sell in North
America as well. “Two or three years
ago, people looked for the cheapest
clothes washer on the showroom
floor,” says IR’s Murray. “Now they
more often look for washers with an
Energy Star rating.”
Whether the motor is in an air conditioner, clothes washer, dishwasher,
or refrigerator, the general approach
is the same: replace an old-style constant-
speed motor with one capable
of operating at variable speeds. Then
optimize its operation for the conditions
at hand.
The quest for efficiency has appliance
makers moving away from induction
motors and toward switched reluctance and brushless-dc motors.
Benefits include not only energy efficiency
but also longer motor life. “In
an old refrigerator, for example, there
is motor wear and tear because of the
switching at rated speed,” says Innes.
“A variable-speed motor spends less
time at top speed so it lasts longer,
and the system operates at a more
consistent temperature.”
Not all of the energy savings is in
the motor and drive. “The motor only
accounts for about 15% of the energy
used in a washing cycle. Most of the
rest of it is associated with water consumption,”
says IR’s Murray. “With an
intelligent agitator, you can get more
washing action with less water.
The typical way of driving energyefficient
appliance motors is with
an inverter circuit IGBT switches
for high-power applications such
as washing machines and air conditioners,
MOSFETs for those such as
dishwashers with lower voltage and
current demands. Then add modules
that handle specific conditions characterizing
appliances of a given type.
For example, electronics for washing-
machine motors typically have
ratings of 600 V and 30 A; those for
air conditioners, ratings of 600 V
and 75 A. That means a different set
of thermal demands for each set of
modules. Drivers for dishwasher motors
are typically 3-A, 250-V devices.
Thus their thermal management is
less of an issue.
“The topology for all those drivers
are quite similar,” says Fairchild’s Innes. “We modify the components
we make for the application, then
match them for efficiency.”
The modular approach addresses
the fact that there are differences
between applications that concern
more than just the size of the motor.
Different appliances have different
modes of operation that need special
handling. For example, superefficient
washers spin clothes at much
higher speeds than older models. The
faster the spin, the less moisture left
in clothes. “We can halve the amount
of heat you have to blow through
clothes to get rid of the moisture,” says
Murray.
Getting PM motors to these higher
spin speeds necessitates a method
called field weakening which the controller
must implement. It is essentially
a technique that controls current
through the stator windings in a
manner that effectively weakens the
magnetic field of the rotor, reducing
its counter EMF, so it can spin faster.
On the other hand, dishwasher
motors don’t run at a speed that involves
field weakening, so their controllers don’t need to implement the
technique. But ground-fault detection
may be an issue in high-power
air conditioners, so their gate drivers
typically include a means of protecting
against faults.
Use of a variable-speed approach in residential central-air installations
may eliminate the need for dual compressors.
It has been typical on central
air systems to use one compressor for
powering up, a second for managing
temperatures once the building has
cooled down. A single compressor
powered by a variable-speed motor can handle both jobs. “Manufacturers
have learned from Japanese makers
of air-conditioning systems how to do
this,” says IR’s Aengus Murray. “A power
controller and dc motor is less expensive
than using two compressors. And
because the motor is more efficient
it can be smaller so there is a savings
there as well.”
Control of the compressor speed optimizes
the refrigerant flow so the rate
of heat transfer matches the load. Other
efficiency gains are available by controlling
not just the compressor speed but
also that of the fan. A variable fan speed
ensures the system operates at the right
temperatures and pressures through
the refrigeration cycle. “Fan makers can
buy an integrated motor and controller
with the electronics built into the motor.
They see no difference in the installation,”
says Murray. “That leads them to
get involved with a variable-speed drive
controlling both the compressor and
fan. That is the stage where most U.S.
manufacturers are today.”
It isn’t just consumers who are
looking for energy savings in motors.
Industrial concerns are adopting the
same techniques because the incremental
gains can be compelling. For
example, experts figure that the use of
variable-speed motors in the 46 elevators
of Shanghai’s new financial center
would save enough energy to power
129,000 Chinese households annually.
The problem, though, is that the design
of energy-efficient drives is new
territory for a lot of engineers. “Many designers
have used the same approach
for years and this is something new for
them,” says Innes. “In many cases they’ve
never done the driver design at all and
they aren’t comfortable with it.”
That situation will likely change as
“high efficiency” gets redefined as “accepted
practice.”
Make Contact
Fairchild Semiconductor, industrial
applications, tinyurl.com/yr7w93
Fairchild online seminars, tinyurl.com/29g9vc
International Rectifier Inc., motor
control library, tinyurl.com/2hz6v5
International Rectifier Technical
papers, tinyurl.com/29jva8
Comparing energy-efficient motors
It isn’t just speed control that is making appliances
and other motion-based applications
more efficient. Motors that excel at
variable speeds just operate more efficiently
than older models spinning at constant
speeds. One indication of the difference
comes from an analysis by International
Rectifier Inc. which ranked losses of induction
motors, synchronous reluctance
motors, permanent-magnet synchronous
motors, and internal permanent-magnet
motors.
One problem with more
efficient motors has been
that the rare-earth magnets
in their construction have
been expensive. That situation
started improving in
the late 1990s and continues
today. One analysis by IR compared the relative costs of components found
in 750-W induction motors with those of an equivalent internal permanentmagnet
motor. Using material costs as of 2006, the IPM came in cheaper by
over $1/motor.
There are also subtleties to driving the most-efficient PM motors. Brushless-dc
motors are happy with trapezoidal drive signals. On the other hand, PM synchronous
motors and IPM motors have a sinusoidal back-EMF, and the drive
signals must likewise be sinusoidal. It is only recently that motor-control platforms
have had the necessary horse power to synthesize such signals.
The differences in drive signals stem largely from rotor construction.
Ordinary PM motors have magnets on the surface of their rotor. In contrast,
IPM motors put magnets inside slots on the rotor. This brings efficiencies in
managing rotor flux at high speeds when field weakening comes into play. |