That certainly was
my reaction as I stood in one of
the company’s facilities holding
a shingle with thin-film solar
cells built in. The machine behind
me was cranking out solar
shingles by the hundreds. Eventually
many of us could have
these things wired into our roofs.
The idea would be an expensive
proposition today, but the costs
are going in the right direction.
There will be a problem,
though, when everybody on the
block is plugged into an alternative
energy source. On a sunny
day at noon when most people
aren’t home, those solar cells will
generate more electricity than
most homes need. They’ll all
want to send power back to the
substation serving them. That
would be impossible today. Substations
just aren’t designed to
work with a net power flow that
is “backwards.”
There are ways to make
“backwards” flow feasible, but
they aren’t free. “Usually a distribution
system can handle about
15% of its rated capacity in distributed
generation without having
to make any changes,” says
Energy Power Research Institute
Senior Technical Fellow Roger
Dugan. “A technical solution can
address the situation of larger
capacity. But the bigger problem
is in figuring out who will pay
for those changes.”
The who-pays problem is
handled today by giving the last
alternative energy owner on the
system a bill. If your solar cells
are the ones that send the substation
over the magic 15% level,
you could be in for an electrical
shock of a different
kind.
The utility
may dun you
to cover new
line reclosers,
step voltage
regulators, and engineering
work which is “not trivial,” says
Dugan.
There are more equitable ways
of handling the costs, but the
most obvious approach is politically
incorrect: Penalize distributed
generation households
by paying them a below-market
rate for the electricity they generate.
The difference goes into
a kitty for handling changes in
distribution made necessary by
solar and wind power.
It’s unlikely that many alternative
energy fans will confront this
scenario anytime soon, though,
simply because the costs of alternative
energy remain steep.
“Solar photovoltaic systems on
roofs are usually only 6-kW peak
output at most,” says Dugan.
“The cost of system would run
about $15,000. That’s about all
most people can afford today.”
Still, he admits, “If there were a
technology breakthrough that
would bring the price of those
solar shingles down to where
they would be no brainers, then
we might have to rethink some
things on the distribution side.”
Speaking as a guy who just
found out he needs a new roof,
I’m not eager to see this day
come, even if I get a break on my
utility bill. If you think a reroofing
job is expensive now, wait till
you see what it costs when there
are solar cells in the shingles.
Leland Teschler, Editor