It isn’t just more-efficient lighting
that is driving down energy bills.
Compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs)
and LEDs wouldn’t be found
in many light sockets today if it
weren’t for electronics able to economically
drive these bulbs. And
there are still lessons being learned
about how to get the cost out of illumination
systems.
Take fluorescent lighting, for
example. The old-time ballasts
powering fluorescent tubes were
little more than transformers that
energized the tube gas by applying
a high voltage to heat the filaments.
The ballast also serves as a current
limiter when the lamp is on. The
problem with old-style ballasts was
one of both bulk and inefficiency.
CFLs only took off with the advent
of electronic-ballast circuits that
were both economical and compact
enough to fit in the base of a lamp
holder. Today’s CFL drivers are basically
switch-mode power-supply
circuits that include power-factor
correction and protection against
such conditions as shorts and openbulb
filaments. These use switching
circuitry instead of transformers to
generate the high voltages (about
500 V) that initially energize fluorescent lights and the lower
voltages (about 200 V)
that sustain lamp operation.
Fluorescent
bulbs are most
efficient when
operating at
the 20 kHz and
higher frequencies
that electronic
switchers generate.
Operation at higher
frequencies also lets
ballast components be physically
smaller and makes for a more-compact
package.
It isn’t just CFLs that have electronic
ballasts. Linear fluorescents
have gone electronic as well. As of
2006, DOE regulations dictated
what are called ballast-efficacy ratings
basically a measure of energy
efficiency. The ratings are such
that transformer-style ballasts aren’t
efficient enough for many of the
most common fluorescents used
in shop and factory lighting. In the same
year, the EU banned all
magnetic ballasts, forcing a
move to electronic ballasts for
fluorescent bulbs sold there.
Ballasts may be going electronic
but not all of them have
the same level of integration.
Some manufacturers still design
their own. “Cost has been
a barrier to the use of singlechip
ballasts,” says Fairchild
Semiconductor Director of
Marketing Claudia Innes. But
there are subtleties to driving
a fluorescent bulb that can be
a learning process for some
manufacturers. “Compared
to powering an incandescent
bulb, you have to account for
more conditions and provide
safety features for different
kinds of failures,” she says. “A
lot of designers don’t know
how to do this. So the electronic-ballast chips
build in a lot of failure protection to make sure
a problem doesn’t damage the entire ballast.”
For example, lamp impedance changes with
age. This can move the oscillation frequency
away from its most-efficient operation point.
To check for faults, ballast circuits must watch
the crest factor (the ratio of peak to rms current).
A crest factor exceeding four generally
indicates the lamp is at its end of life.
Dimming is another issue. Ballast circuits
usually adjust a voltage-controlled oscillator to
dim CFLs, but “If you put a dimmable CFL next
to a dimmed incandescent, you’ll notice they
don’t dim to the same extent and they don’t
dim the same way. From a design point of view,
there are several more things you have to account
for,” says Innes.
A typical electronic ballast first rectifies ac,
then converts the resulting dc to a signal in
the range of 50 kHz through a MOSFET or
IGBT switch. This switching action can generate
harmonics in the current and voltage. These
distortions cause radiated interference and put
a damper on efficiency. So electronic ballasts
generally incorporate power-factor-correction
(PFC) circuits to compensate. PFC chips basically
keep the switch on time at a fixed relationship
to the input line voltage so the load
appears resistive to the ac line.
A ballast-control chip then handles preheating
and ignition, watches for conditions that
indicate an open filament, and implements
zero-voltage switching of the final high-voltage
stage. The high-voltage stage that actually connects to the lamp is usually a half-bridge powering
either MOSFETs or IGBTs.
Whether to use one or several chips to implement
these functions often depends on how
manufacturers view trade-offs between the cost
of components versus the total system. “Every
connection is a point of failure and every
component picked-and-placed has a cost. Still,
some people design their own,” says Innes.
Spotlight on LEDs
Two years ago, there was no such thing as an
LED streetlight. That all changed in 2006 with
the advent of superbright LEDs. “Now it takes
under 100 LEDs to generate the equivalent to a
high-pressure sodium light,” says Cree Inc. Director
of Business Development Mark McClear.
Key to this turn of events was CREE’s development
of its EZBright LED power chip. Since
then, other manufacturers have brought out
versions of high-output LEDs. But CREE has
come up with a new LED topology that it says
is more efficient than earlier chips by a factor of
two and figures it is perhaps a year ahead of its
closest competitors.
Current research by LED makers focuses
on bettering power efficiency and lumens/
dollar spent. Today these figures are about
100 lumens/W and 40 lumens/dollar. Expectations
are that the year 2010 will see 150 lumens/W
with costs down substantially. “Every time we
improve efficiency, it makes possible another
wave of new applications,” says McClear.
It turns out that the benefits of LEDs are
not limited to efficiency. “It costs a municipality as much to change a bulb as to buy a new
lamp. Because LEDs last two to five times longer
than incumbent bulbs, they avoid a lot of
maintenance costs,” says McClear. And there
is a sleeper benefit to using them for outside
lighting: “When you replace a yellow sodium
light with LEDs, people think you have cleaned
up the place,” McClear says. “That’s because the
eye has more visual acuity in the LED’s light
range. Surveillance cameras work better with
LED light and people actually feel safer in parking
decks illuminated with LEDs.”
Several lamp makers now make outdoor fixtures
incorporating LEDs. One of these, Beta
Lighting in Sturtevant, Wis., employs CREE
LEDs configured as light bars, each containing
20 LEDs. Beta adds light bars to get fixtures of a
specific output. The firm says its design is protected
by over 20 patents.
“Our biggest issue was thermal management.
Once we solved that, we optimized the
optical design to get the most out of the LED,”
says Beta Sales Director Kevin Orth.
Though LED-powered streetlamps are more
expensive than the conventional lights they replace,
they cost less to own, Orth says.
How to do Drivers
LEDs may be the wave of the future, but
there doesn’t seem to be a consensus about how
best to configure their source of power. “So far,
there is no set topology for driving LEDs,” says
National Semiconductor Corp. Senior Application
Engineer Chris Richardson. “If you want
to drive 100 LEDs to get the maximum amount of light, there are many ways to
do it so many, in fact, that a
lot of people get intimidated by
the task.”
There are three general approaches
to driving banks of
LEDs today, Richardson says.
The first, and most efficient, is to
simply drive the LEDs in series
from a dc supply. The problem
with this approach is that it can
involve voltages high enough to
be classified as hazardous by UL.
The high-voltage components
involved can be expensive. “It is
okay if you really understand all
the safety codes and are willing
to double insulate and isolate.
But it gets ugly in terms of safety
testing and I don’t recommend
it,” says Richardson.
A second slightly different
approach also uses a singlestage
power supply but incorporates galvanic
isolation, usually in the form of a transformer.
This gets around some of the safety issues and
has the advantage of availability as commercial
off-the-shelf units. The problem is that this approach
is only practical for driving strings of
about eight LEDs at most, says Richardson. “You
might produce at most 1 A this way,” he explains.
“It is expensive because you pay a premium for
the engineering that goes into the supply.”
The third way is the most widely used. It
employs a commercial ac/dc converter that
produces an output below 60 V, thus staying
below hazardous voltages. The output goes to
multiple dc/dc converters, each driving an LED
string. Besides avoiding dangerous voltage levels,
the approach guarantees some of the LEDs
stay lit in the event one fails open.
“You need more engineering time to design
this sort of circuit, but the result is the most
flexible and reliable of the three possibilities,”
says Richardson. By eliminating the need to
work at high voltages, it may also be the least
difficult to realize for most engineering staffs.
“I haven’t met many power-supply engineers
well versed in both high-voltage ac and low-voltage
dc,” says Richardson.
Make Contact
Beta LED, (800) 236-6800, betaled.com
CREE Inc., (919) 313-5300, cree.com
Fairchild Semiconductor,
(207) 775-8100, fairchildsemi.com
National Semiconductor, (800) 272-9959,
national.com