When styling goes wild
Form without function makes no sense when designing products that serve a purpose or do a job.
Mike Hudspeth
But, all things being equal, customers select the better-looking product when faced with two that do the same thing. Yet, although there are similarities to both jobs, industrial designers are not
stylists. Consider these examples
of "styling gone wild."
Early on, car design borrowed
heavily from the aircraft
industry. Airplanes with sweptback wings and smooth, slippery
fuselages were hot, so these style
elements soon found their way
into the family sedan. Tail fins
became the icon of an era. The
look of these ranged from great
to ridiculous. But tail fins
eventually disappeared,
probably because everyone
realized they served no useful
purpose (like spoilers).
A new design sensibility then
came into vogue, bringing econoboxes such as the VW Rabbit and
the Chrysler K-car. The
pendulum had swung in the
opposite direction. As a pendulum is apt to do, it kept
swinging. In the eighties and
early nineties, most cars looked
like penny-loafers, again for no
particular reason. Today, blocky,
massive cars such as the Dodge
Magnum resemble nothing so
much as whittled bars of soap.
And it's ridiculous to drive
vehicles as large as Sherman
tanks just to go to the five-and-dime.
You may not agree with my
opinions on what looks good and
what doesn't. And that's okay.
Beauty is in the eye of the
beholder, after all. But the upshot
is, when style gets in the way of
function, look out. The result
won't be pretty.
Mike Hudspeth, ISDA, is an
industrial designer with more than
two decades of experience. Got a
question about industrial design?
You can reach Mike at Mike.Hudspeth@TycoHealthcare.com.