Image

What’s the Difference Between Stereolithography and Selective Laser Sintering?

March 23, 2015
Depending on the application, one must weigh the pros and cons of a liquid- or powder-based approach to optimize 3D printing.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

With the rapid growth of 3D printing, some people may confuse the different types of printing processes. In fact, the misunderstanding is so great that organizations are creating standards to facilitate better communications when talking about additive-manufacturing (AM) processes. We’ll explore the differences between two of these AM processes: stereolithography (SLA) and selective laser sintering (SLS).

First, there’s a difference between ultraviolet (UV) lamp cured and UV laser cured. The lamp-cured processes such as multi-jet and some fused-deposition-modeling (FDM) processes are not SLA, and should not be confused with it.

SLA Process

The SLA laser travels through the liquid photo-resin, building the part layer by layer.

SLA is a photopolymerization process in which a build tray is submerged 0.002 to 0.006 in. (0.05 to 0.15mm) in a basin of liquid photosensitive material. This depth can vary based on laser strength, material, or tolerance desired. A UV laser (not lamp) solidifies one slice of the part onto the build tray. The tray then submerges, another 0.002 to 0.006 in., and the laser solidifies the next slice of the part. The thickness of the layers can affect the quality of print and tolerances. An industry average tolerance is around 3.9 × 10-3in. (0.1 mm). The laser travels the entire path of the part’s cross-section as it builds up each layer, so speed becomes an important consideration.

Commercial SLA printers generally cost a few thousand dollars.

SLS Process

After the part is formed in the powder-bed process, it’s removed and cleaned for any post processing. The powder that’s left un-sintered acts as a support material; after the process, it can be sifted and reused.

In powder-bed SLS, a layer of powdered material is carefully laid down by a leveler or roller on the build tray. A laser then sinters the cross-section of the part. Subsequently, the tray drops another 0.002 to 0.004 in. (0.05 to 0.10 mm) and the process repeats. Similar to SLA, layer thickness varies based on laser strength, material, or tolerance desired.

A variation of SLS is called the cladding process. One way to clad is via powder jet, whereby a print head sprays powder to form layers as a laser sinters each layer. The powder-jet cladding process may be used to fix broken or damaged parts. Users can even align the grain structure of the new material with that of the existing part, an important consideration for corrosion resistance. Often times, cladded parts require post machining.

Some 3D printer companies offer a three-step process in which one machine clads (puts one material over another), measures, and grids the part to the desired tolerance. These processes often use fiber lasers, rather than CO2 lasers, to lower operating cost and make control simpler.

SLS economical printer can cost anywhere from $12,000 to $33,000.

SLS vs. SLA

One major difference between SLA and SLS revolves around material selection. SLA works with polymers and resins, not metals. SLS works with a few polymers, such as nylon and polystyrene, but can also handle metals like steel, titanium, and others. SLA works with liquids, while SLS uses powders that raise safety concerns. Breathing in fine particulates of nickel, for example, can be harmful. Breathing apparatuses and ventilation should be considered, depending on the type of powder.

SLA liquid photopolymers cost $80 to $100 or more per liter. SLS powders costs between $300 and $600 per kilogram, and can be difficult to even purchase. However, according to some industry observers, the recent surge experienced in the SLS market has made availability more widespread.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

Although both 3D techniques use lasers, they operate at different wavelengths. As mentioned, SLA lasers operate in the UV wavelengths to cure epoxy within a resin. SLS relies on higher-powered lasers to compact and sinter metal powders. Therefore, SLS generally requires high peak energies to physically compress metal powders, while SLA can be used at lower peak powers depending on the photosensitive polymer.

About the Author

Jeff Kerns | Technology Editor

Studying mechanical engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), he worked in the Polymer Research Lab. Utilizing RIT’s co-op program Jeff worked for two aerospace companies focusing on drafting, quality, and manufacturing for aerospace fasteners and metallurgy. He also studied abroad living in Dubrovnik, Croatia. After college, he became a commissioning engineer, traveling the world working on precision rotary equipment. Then he attended a few masters courses at the local college, and helped an automation company build equipment.

Growing up in Lancaster County, PA he always liked to tinker, build, and invent. He is ecstatic to be at Machine Design Magazine in New York City and looks forward to producing valuable information in the mechanical industry. 

Like him on Facebook and follow him on Twitter.

Sponsored Recommendations

50 Years Old and Still Plenty of Drive

Dec. 12, 2024
After 50 years of service in a paper plant, an SEW-EURODRIVE K160 gear unit was checked. Some parts needed attention, but the gears remained pristine.

Explore the power of decentralized conveying

Dec. 12, 2024
Discover the flexible, efficient MOVI-C® Modular Automation System by SEW-EURODRIVE—engineered for quick startup and seamless operation in automation.

Goodbye Complexity, Hello MOVI-C

Dec. 12, 2024
MOVI-C® modular automation system – your one-stop-shop for every automation task. Simple, future-proof, with consulting and service worldwide.

Sawmill Automation: Going Where Direct-Stop and Hydraulic Technologies “Cant”

Aug. 29, 2024
Exploring the productivity and efficiency gains of outfitting a sawmill’s resaw line with VFDs, Ethernet and other automated electromechanical systems.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Machine Design, create an account today!